A program can be great, but if it’s not easy to use, or if the interface gives you headaches, you’re going to try to avoid it. That’s good to know, but I wish they had also focused on its GUI. They have worked so hard to develop this. It may seem a bit expensive but for polyphonic editing it’s absolutely the best. What’s out there that does the same thing basically, with polyphonic instruments like a simple piano, doesn’t cost an arm and a leg, and has a usable interface? Text too small and low contrast GUI.”.īut well, enough ranting about Melodyne. This is basic stuff, it just takes having someone work with it for a while and asking them what are the good things, and what are the bad ones, and in the “bad” column, they’re going to say “Hard to read. If you have the background in a dark gray, and the text in black, that is not high contrast, it’s very low contrast. And they have options for GUI color scheme, which makes it dark without many the text and icons, lines and other graphical elements white, so it’s even worse, because they call it “High Contrast”, and they don’t have a clue what contrast really is. Then everything is microscopic, all the text in the GUI, menus and everything else. Melodyne is too small at the same resolution I use Cubase, and the GUI was obviously written for Windows and poorly ported to macOS, because any zoom in or out makes my Mac Studio Ultra feel like a Commodore 128. Steinberg knows how to make contrast work, while Celemony does not.Ĭubase in macOS doesn’t have a scalable GUI, but depending on the resolution and monitor size, it’s still easy to see. Cubase Pro 12 is a pleasure to use for many things, but the GUI is beautiful and not harsh on the eyes. Not the end of the world if I use it for other things besides this, but then the problem is that I hate the interface. And perhaps it might be a good investment for things other than my niece’s piece, but basically if I want to upgrade to the first version that allows polyphonic instrument editing, I’d have to shell out $320. Its flexible interface adapts perfectly to the requirements of each situation.I wanted to use Melodyne to correct the pitch of a few notes in a song my niece played on the piano, but it turns out that to even be able to correct anything that is polyphonic you need a paid version. Melodyne can be operated via ARA or as a plug-in directly in a DAW. Using an ultra-musical equalizer, resynthesis and morphing. Access the overtones of your instruments directly and change their tone color in unique ways. And the editing functions for these important musical parameters are just as comprehensive as for the notes themselves. Melodyne also recognizes chords, keys, tunings and tempos. Only Melodyne makes music this transparent and tangible. See and edit the notes of multiple tracks simultaneously in a single window. Using intelligent macros or – with great precision – by hand. Edit intonation, melody and harmony, but also rhythms and grooves, dynamics, formants and much more. Even with polyphonic instruments like the piano and guitar. With Melodyne, you see the notes in your recordings and samples, and can manipulate and modify them at will.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |